Dna exonerations worked on by the innocence project. Garrett writes, dna testing has exonerated over 250 people convicted of crimes they didnt commit. Wrongful convictions and the dna revolution edited by. This book profiles people who have been wrongfully accused, convicted, incarcerated, and ultimately exonerated. This chapter discusses the legal implications of the committees conclusions and recommendations. Dna from the cigarette butts led police to arrest michael lester. Forensic dna databanks and privacy of information dna. For example, an expert testifying about dna profiling for the prosecution might say that the dna profile created from the crimescene evidence has a 4to5 probability or 80 percent chance of matching the dna profile created from the defendants sample.
Dna evidence, wrongful convictions and wrongful acquittals executive summary the retention of dna and other forensic evidence following the completion of the trial process raises many issues for the criminal law. As we enter an era in which dna evidence is routinely used in criminal investigations, errors that led to wrongful convictionsincluding mistakes later corrected with dna testsmay seem to be fading into history. In other words, your dna is a combination of your mothers and your fathers dna. How we did it a handbook for the wrongly convicted 9781434837639 by pardue, michael. Jun 27, 2014 dna evidence overturns conviction of florida man who spent 28 years on death row. May 27, 2014 dna exoneration cases involve irrefutable evidence that the suspect was wrongfully convicted, and can spring from a number of causes, including bad lawyering and government misconduct, as well as the following relatively common reasons.
Investigators could compare dna profiles of biological evidence samples with a. His lawyer insisted on more dna tests, which exonerated him. Indeed, dna science has been pivotal in exploding the longheld myth that wrongful convictions are rare. Its terrible to think that a person is wrongfully convicted and incarcerated for a good part. Learn about dna evidence and more at findlaw s criminal procedure section. In nearly half of the cases pursued by the innocence project, dna exonerates the convicted, and in over 40 percent of the cases in which a convicted person is exonerated by dna evidence, that same dna evidence is used to eventually identify the actual guilty person. Unless you have an identical twin, your dna is unique to you. Dna technology is rapidly becoming the method of choice when it comes to linking individuals with crime scenes and criminal assaults. In the last decade the number of dna exonerations has held steady at about 20 cases per year. Moreover, as some of the commentaries suggest, dna evidencelike fingerprint evidenceoffers prosecutors important new tools for the identification and apprehension of some of the most violent perpetrators, particularly in cases of sexual. Ronald jones, who served 14 years in prison, 8 of them on death row, before he was absolved by dna evidence and pardoned based on innocence.
An indiana man who spent nearly 25 years in prison for a 1992 rape until dna evidence helped free him alleges in a federal lawsuit that he was wrongfully convicted by authorities who fabricated evidence against him and took advantage of his severe mental health issues. The jury that convicted williams never heard about the dna evidence, and it is hard to imagine that if he was tried today that he would get a death sentence, given the new doubts about guilt. In nearby houston, texas, the county clerk destroyed evidence whenever its storerooms got full, so there have been just six dna exonerations, despite a major scandal that led to the shutdown of the houston crime lab. Opinion dna evidence and wrongful convictions the new. Inadequate lawyers can cause wrongful convictions, too. Among the many new tools that science has provided for the analysis of forensic evidence is the powerful and controversial analysis of deoxyribonucleic acid, or dna, the material that makes up the genetic code of most organisms. On one side, is fresh dna or other evidence to be used by the prosecution to mount an appeal against what is perceived to be a.
Conversely, is such evidence to be used to prove the innocence of a wrongfully convicted person. Use of dna information in the legal system dna technology in. It was this general question that applicant the unsuccessfully sought to have considered by the high court in. The police say they will start expunging some of the 82,000 people in the database who have never been convicted of a crime. Those actual perpetrators went on to be convicted of 152 additional violent crimes, including 82 sexual assaults, 35 murders, and 35 other violent crimes while the innocent sat behind bars for their earlier offenses.
However there are many disadvantages to dna testing, such as a challenge of accuracy, the costs of dna testing and the possibl. Dna keeps overturning convictions, but spike in exonerations. Throughout that time, dna testing and dna exonerations have increased. In this unsettling indepth analysis, brandon garrett examines what went wrong in the cases of the first 250 wrongfully convicted people to be exonerated by dna testing. By one estimate, the lab handled dna evidence from at least 500 cases a. The lds church released an essay on their website titled book of mormon and dna studies. How forensic dna evidence can lead to wrongful convictions. Top 10 wrongful convictions overturned by dna evidence. Yet hildwin was convicted in large part because of dna evidence found at the crime scene semen found in the. Dna evidence in the legal system the evaluation of forensic. For a brief period, dna evidence helped exculpate defendants who were convicted in the pre dna era, but dna often cannot help identify the true perpetrator because no sample of dna.
An exoneree shares his story of wrongful conviction in. New dna evidence uncovered by attorneys representing ted bradford in a federal lawsuit now links the rape to the victims brotherinlaw. Jul 16, 20 twentyfive years ago today, serial killer timothy wilson spencer became the first man in america to be convicted of murder on dna evidence. That is the case when the admissibility of dna evidence is judged as a matter of first impression. Dec 06, 2017 in criminal investigation, dna evidence can be a gamechanger. Doug plank, senior attorney, national legal research group. How some see texas as the gold standard against wrongful convictions.
Here are 25 wrongly convicted felons exonerated by dna evidence. Dna evidence overturns conviction of florida man who spent 28. By studying the dataset of dna exonerations, we know that precise factors lead to wrongful convictions. Condemning the innocent makes a mockery of justice, robbing men and women of dignity, relationship, time, opportunity, and freedom. In 2007, after decades of insisting he was innocent, miller was finally vindicated. Apr 12, 2017 as we enter an era in which dna evidence is routinely used in criminal investigations, errors that led to wrongful convictionsincluding mistakes later corrected with dna testsmay seem to be. Alan crotzer spent 24 years in prison for two rapes that he did not commit before dna evidence. But dna is just one piece of the puzzle, rarely giving a clear he did it answer. Dna profiling also called dna fingerprinting is the process of determining an individuals dna. Professor peter gills book, misleading dna evidence. Abundance of dna evidence not enough to prevent wrongful.
Dna evidence frees wrongly convicted ca criminal defense. Joseph wambaugh wrote in the blooding, his book on the midlands murders. For the most part, i appreciate and like the narratives. These topics are explored in five highinterest chapters including those convicted and then exonerated because of new dna technology. Every criminal law scholar in law schools and criminal justice departments would benefit by reading the volume.
Controversy in dna profiling how dna profiling works. Introduction to forensic dna evidence for criminal justice professionals. The tragedy of wrongful convictions results from multiple factors. Written by leaders in the fields of biology and statistics, the book emphasizes the interpretation of test results and provides the necessary formulae in an easily accessible manner. Dna exonerations are cases in which dna evidence is instrumental in proving innocence, and so these tend to be crimes with blood or other bodily fluids, such as sexual assault or homicide. Both sides to the dna evidence equation are live issues in the contemporary debate, federally and for the states. In ake, the supreme court reversed a conviction because the trial court had refused to appoint an expert to assist the indigent defendant, who was relying on an. A wellknown example of this is the defense strategy used in the o. Ever since the first use in the us, in 1989 of dna to exonerate a person wrongfully convicted of a crime, the innocence project has worked to ensure that justice is served. He became the 200th american to be cleared by dna evidence of a wrongful conviction. A man with parkinsons disease who was unable to walk more than a few feet without assistance was convicted of a burglary based on a partial dna profile match. Introduction to forensic dna evidence for criminal justice.
The advent of dna technology has helped to reduce the number of wrongful convictions, and has also been instrumental in exonerating a number of convicted prisoners. The defendants are convicted for crimes not committed where errors are not proven until their death or having served a lot of jail time. Dna evidence can be collected from blood, hair, skin cells, and other bodily substances. When confronted with evidence of the crime and the dna match, lester confessed to those two burglaries, was convicted and sentenced to state prison. Kevin benefield, who worked in the same building where pelkey worked, was ultimately linked to the dna evidence, convicted and sentenced to 60 years in prison. However, with the emergence of forensic dna in collection of evidence, the rate of wrongful. The conclusion states, much as critics and defenders of the book of mormon would like to use dna studies to support their views, the evidence is simply inconclusive. In dallas, texas, where biological evidence was preserved, we have a large set of nineteen dna exonerations. It describes the most important procedural and evidentiary rules that affect the use of forensic dna evidence, identifies the questions of scientific fact that have been disputed in court. Abundance of dna evidence not enough to prevent wrongful convictions. Additionally, each state has difference rules regarding evidence, and any failure to comply with the particulars of each states requirements can result in a refusal of the court to examine dna evidence. The first man to be exonerated by dna evidence was gary dotson in 1989. List of wrongful convictions in the united states wikipedia.
Data concerning the causes of wrongful convictions are becoming both more plentiful and precise. He was convicted after a jury trial in which nowdisgraced forensic pathologist charles smiths evidence played a major role in determining the time of death, the cause of death, and whether the girl had been sexually assaulted. Although dna evidence is not available to prove the innocence of a wrongfully convicted person in most cases, the cases in which it has been used to help demonstrate innocence have received a great deal of press. Exoneration statistics and databases innocence project. Overworked and underfunded defense lawyers lack the resources to vigorously test the prosecutions evidence at trial, and people who are wrongly convicted and imprisoned have no right to counsel after their cases are affirmed on direct appeal. Dna evidence frees a woman convicted of killing her. The book is more accessible than contributor hugo adam bedaus the death penalty in america lj 31597, the standard work in the field, and more pragmatic than austin sarats when the state kills lj 4101, which attacks the death penalty from a philosophical and moral perspective. Theyre hoping the yakima county prosecutor and police.
But it wasnt until 2009 that dna evidence finally cleared ireland in the 1986 death of barbara pelkey, a 30yearold mother of four, in the town of wallingford. Millers story is now part of a new book called anatomy of innocence. Close to of them were exonerated by dna evidence, and the numbers of dna exonerees is growing as more states provide for postconviction dna testing. According to a consortium of forensic experts who released a report earlier this year, there are limits to what dna can tell us about a crime. Its 30 years since dna fingerprinting was first used in a police. Dna has played a role in roughly a quarter of exonerations since 1989, the year it was first used to clear david vasquez, who was falsely convicted of murder in arlington county, va. How texas is becoming the gold standard against wrongful. Golden state killer suspects capture sparks dna site privacy.
At times, dna evidence has been misused or misunderstood, leading to miscarriages of justice. Dna exonerations in the united states innocence project. Since then, the technology has been used in criminal court cases in 14 states to clear wrongfully convicted prisoners, some who served more than 20 years in prison. Books, articles, and studies convicting the innocent. Bloodworth was convicted of the brutal rape and murder of a nineyear old girl. Diane and her panel talk about the causes of wrongful convictions and ongoing efforts to free the innocent. There was additional dna present that was not identified due to the size of the sample. The innocence project came across deskovics case in 2006, and conducted further testing with newer technology on the semen in the rape kit. Apr 27, 2018 people who submit dna for ancestors testing are unwittingly becoming genetic informants on their innocent family, said mercer, adding that they have fewer privacy protections than convicted. Top 10 stories of wrongful conviction overturned by dna evidence. When you finish this book you will bless the day that dna evidence came into existance and become thankful for those who never lose faith in a wrongly convicted. The problems involved in equating wrongful acquittals and wrongful convictions are discussed. Judge kozinski on wrongful convictions and excessively.
At the defense attorneys request, the results were sent to the state bureau of investigations dna data base containing the dna patterns of convicted, violent felons in north carolina prisons. The california law calls for the testing of felons convicted of murder and other. Essay on exonerating wrongly convicted people 2162 words. Wrongful convictions are fueled by false witnesses, incompetence of defense lawyers and inadequate evidence among others. The first american on death row exonerated by dna evidence, kirk bloodsworth serves an inspiration to many of those who feel they have been wrongly convicted.
Lee when a san jose man charged with murdering a monte sereno millionaire was suddenly freed last month, prosecutors acknowledged he had an airtight alibi he was drunk and unconscious at a hospital when the victim was killed in. In the past 21 years, more than 250 convicted felons have been exonerated by dna evidence. The registry also maintains a more limited database of known exonerations prior to 1989. Pardue, becky and a great selection of similar new, used and collectible books available now at great prices. Dna evidence, wrongful convictions and wrongful acquittals. Fbi agents cannot legally store dna of a person not convicted of a crime. Federal grant will target wrongful conviction cases with no dna posted on august 11, 2012 by nancy petro 6 comments the vast majority of criminal casessome estimate up to 90 percentdo not have dna evidence to help settle claims of wrongful conviction. Americas wrongfully convicted and exonerated presents oral histories of thirteen people from all walks of life, who, through a combination of alltoocommon factorsoverzealous prosecutors, inept defense lawyers, coercive interrogation tactics, eyewitness misidentificationfound themselves imprisoned for crimes they. Dna evidence frees a woman convicted of killing her daughter lynn dejac and her lawyer, andrew c. Will new dna evidence vindicate yakima man cleared in 1995. During his trial, his defense argued that the relatively shallow gene pool of the region could lead to false positives. The accused has the same profile as the dna recovered from the crime scene. The compensation laws for those who have been wrongfully imprisoned vary greatly from state to state.
This book examines the lessons learned from twentyfive years of dna exonerations and identifies lingering challenges. Dna has now freed more than three hundred innocent prisoners in the united states. Dna exonerations have shattered confidence in the criminal justice system by exposing how often we have convicted the innocent and let the guilty walk free. In the preceding chapters, we have tried to clarify the scientific issues involved in forensic dna testing. The prosecution presented the evidence that clays dna was found in the rape kit. Wrongfully convicted inmates struggle to get state.
To date, new dna technology has freed 367 wrongfully convicted prisoners, of which 41 served time for crimes they did not commit and 21 were on death row awaiting execution. Improvements in the use of dna as a forensic tool continue to help improve the accuracy of the factfinding process. Since the late 1980s, dna testing has exonerated more than 250 wrongly convicted people, who spent an average of years in prison for crimes they didnt commit. Of the 330 people exonerated by dna tests between 1989 and 2015, 71% were convicted based on forensic testimony, much of which was flawed. Heres a cautionary tale about dna contamination from the san francisco chronicle. It is written, for the most part, in firstperson narratives with some small clarification and background by the authors sprinkled throughout each narrative. Dna evidence frees illinois man convicted of rape, murder in 1984. This chapter provides an overview of how dna evidence might be used in the. One home owner alerted police that the individual who burglarized the residence had left cigarette butts behind. Although dna evidence is not available to prove the innocence of a wrongfully convicted. Wrongfully convicted inmates struggle to get state compensation in dozens of cases people convicted and later cleared by dna or new evidence never received state compensation. Killer breakthrough the day dna evidence first nailed a murderer.
New kansas law to compensate wrongfully convicted defendants. Wrongful conviction laws in neighboring states are flawed, she said. Jan 30, 2019 one of the most reliable forms of evidence in many criminal cases is in our genes, encoded in dna deoxyribonucleic acid. On november 12, 2017, based solely on the dna evidence, the jury convicted clay of firstdegree criminal sexual conduct. The power and accuracy of dna identification techniques have led to novel applications, including the creation of dna databases that catalog dna profiles of convicted violent offenders, as well as voluntary dna dragnets in which police take dna samples from large groups of people to compare their dna with evidence found at the. In a routine dna paternity test, the markers used are short tandem repeats strs, short pieces of dna that occur in. Sep 16, 20 despite dna evidence that showed the semen in the rape kit was not a match, deskovic was convicted and sentenced to 15 years to life in prison. Feb 25, 2012 they include giving convicted people greater access to dna testing and clarifying the authority of judges to order a comparison of dna evidence recovered at a crime scene against dna stored in. Some people were exonerated posthumously this list includes individuals who were sentenced to death and had their sentences overturned by acquittal or pardon. The registry provides detailed information about every known exoneration in the united states since 1989cases in which a person was wrongly convicted of a crime and later cleared of all the charges based on new evidence of innocence.
This list contains names of people who were found guilty of capital crimes and placed on death row, and were later found to be wrongly convicted. In 1991, allan legere was the first canadian to be convicted as a result of dna evidence, for four murders he had committed while an escaped prisoner in 1989. Prisoner almost executed before new dna test saved his life. Aug 22, 2017 prisoner almost executed before new dna test saved his life. His case looked like many othersarrest, swab, match, conviction. Supreme court recently heard oral arguments in the appeal of henry skinner, who was convicted 15 years ago in texas state court on the charges of murdering his girlfriend and her adult sons, and who has spent years trying to have prosecutors test available evidence for dna that he claims will exonerate him. Nov 29, 2004 forensic dna evidence interpretation is the most comprehensive resource for dna casework available today. He had been wrongfully convicted of sexual assault and spent six years in prison before dna evidence led to his exoneration. Dna evidence is increasingly used in criminal trials, and has also become a powerful tool in proving the innocence of wrongly convicted prisoners. Dna evidence is identification evidence, establishing a match with the accused, but also calculating the statistical chances of there being other matches.
Wrongful convictions and the accuracy of the criminal. Federal grant will target wrongful conviction cases with. The association in defence of the wrongly convicted learned of the confession and took up the case. This is what makes dna evidence so valuable in investigations its almost impossible for someone else to have dna that is identical to yours. The first us dna murder conviction twentyfive years on. Dna evidence can provide powerful evidence in support of a.
Five days to execution and other dispatches from the wrongly convicted, by barry scheck. The twoway a judge agreed to vacate christopher abernathys 1987 conviction in the killing of a 15yearold girl after a. The authors belong to the innocence project, an organized attempt to determine the innocence or guilt through recently available dna evidence of those convicted of murderviolent crimes. Dna testing has overthrown the way police collect evidence in a number of criminal cases, especially rape and murder and consequently had a large impact on many past cases.
82 1237 431 845 563 1508 1133 279 672 1118 1563 1482 922 896 477 1190 844 1547 1251 519 340 1084 1692 1103 1199 530 1068 760 920 734 945